Re: [PATCH] add pool pointer to svn_string_t

On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 11:35:40AM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>...
> These seem like reasonable ideas, but I'd like to ponder them. What
> you are advocating is *not* a trivial thing -- it would take quite a
> while to go through all the code and make these cleanups... definitely
> a post-milestone-1 thing.

Absolutely.

I'd like to combine libsvn_string and libsvn_subr for M1. Any drastic change
such as dropping svn_string_t is *definitely* post-M1 in my book. We
heartily agree on that :-)

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/