> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: woensdag 11 mei 2011 2:01
> To: neels_at_apache.org; Neels Hofmeyr
> Cc: dev
> Subject: Re: [svnbench] Revision: 1101392 compiled May 10 2011, 10:07:15
>
> Neels Hofmeyr wrote on Wed, May 11, 2011 at 01:31:02 +0200:
> > The most recent benchmark suggests that the 'svn delete' performance
> > problem I was complaining about earlier is not only gone but completely
> > reversed. 'svn delete' is now EXTREMELY fast when compared to 1.6.
> >
> > Amazing.
> >
> > Also, one has to look really hard for timings where trunk is slower.
> > Quite remarkable perf improvement happening these days.
> >
> > A-ma-zing!
> >
> > ~Neels
> >
>
> Are you sure? The script's output seems a little bit too consistent:
>
> neels_at_apache.org wrote on Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:57:35 +0000:
> > ("1.23|+0.45" means factor=1.23, difference in seconds = 0.45
> > factor < 1 or difference < 0 means '5x5_trunk' is faster than '5x5_1.6')
> ..
> > ("1.23|+0.45" means factor=1.23, difference in seconds = 0.45
> > factor < 1 or difference < 0 means '100x1_trunk' is faster than
'100x1_1.6')
> ..
> > ("1.23|+0.45" means factor=1.23, difference in seconds = 0.45
> > factor < 1 or difference < 0 means '1x100_trunk' is faster than
'1x100_1.6')
> ..
> > ("1.23|+0.45" means factor=1.23, difference in seconds = 0.45
> > factor < 1 or difference < 0 means 'total_trunk' is faster than
'total_1.6')
This is just the explanation how you should read the numbers. The real
numbers are in the tables (which you removed from this mail)
Bert
Received on 2011-05-11 02:03:30 CEST