[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [svnbench] Revision: 1101392 compiled May 10 2011, 10:07:15

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 03:00:50 +0300

Neels Hofmeyr wrote on Wed, May 11, 2011 at 01:31:02 +0200:
> The most recent benchmark suggests that the 'svn delete' performance
> problem I was complaining about earlier is not only gone but completely
> reversed. 'svn delete' is now EXTREMELY fast when compared to 1.6.
>
> Amazing.
>
> Also, one has to look really hard for timings where trunk is slower.
> Quite remarkable perf improvement happening these days.
>
> A-ma-zing!
>
> ~Neels
>

Are you sure? The script's output seems a little bit too consistent:

neels_at_apache.org wrote on Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:57:35 +0000:
> ("1.23|+0.45" means factor=1.23, difference in seconds = 0.45
> factor < 1 or difference < 0 means '5x5_trunk' is faster than '5x5_1.6')
..
> ("1.23|+0.45" means factor=1.23, difference in seconds = 0.45
> factor < 1 or difference < 0 means '100x1_trunk' is faster than '100x1_1.6')
..
> ("1.23|+0.45" means factor=1.23, difference in seconds = 0.45
> factor < 1 or difference < 0 means '1x100_trunk' is faster than '1x100_1.6')
..
> ("1.23|+0.45" means factor=1.23, difference in seconds = 0.45
> factor < 1 or difference < 0 means 'total_trunk' is faster than 'total_1.6')
Received on 2011-05-11 02:01:44 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.