On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 02:02 +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name]
> > Are you sure? The script's output seems a little bit too consistent:
> > neels_at_apache.org wrote on Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:57:35 +0000:
> > > ("1.23|+0.45" means factor=1.23, difference in seconds = 0.45
> > > factor < 1 or difference < 0 means '5x5_trunk' is faster than '5x5_1.6')
> > ..
> This is just the explanation how you should read the numbers. The real
> numbers are in the tables (which you removed from this mail)
heh lol exactly, that's just the legend. Didn't you notice? 1.23 .45? ;)
It is probably healthy to be a little weary of those results, but still.
We had quite bad numbers, now the same thing gives pretty nice numbers.
That ought to say *some*thing.
I did not believe it at first and double checked that the timings look
real. And they do. There are still very very few commands that are
slower by a very very small amount of seconds. The rest is mindblowing.
Received on 2011-05-11 14:01:43 CEST