[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Preferred Subversion 1.13 MPM

From: Carmen Alzzer <carmen_at_gisit.dk>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:24:07 +0200

helo friends,
while this is still hot on here - can you please tip in how your MPM are
handled? also if you have thoughts upon reading my setup, i would be
delighted to hear from you :)

cheers
Carmen

On 2020-04-08 00:37, Carmen Alzzer wrote:
> hello friends,
>
> Thanks for replying - no hard feelings for getting fast up from the
> seat :)
>
> I was thinking the MPM might have a saying, since the process
> management of a certain worker might be optimal for the way Subversion
> operates - i notice that many requests are sent to the server from
> even smaller operations in an SVN client.
>
> What i have picked up from your bag of tricks - is LDAPcaching - now i
> referred to apaches docs for mod_ldap and defined cache TTL to 1 hour
> which is reasonable for my herd of users. It seems that it might have
> had an impact, but i have to have a users verify that it shortened
> runtime, and how much it possibly was.
>
> But im chasing anything that i can on this, and surely i have a lot to
> learn about how to properly operate Subversion for production
> purposes. So what MPM have you guys configured for apache? -and what
> sort of other information could you be interested in Stefan?
> Currently i am using event MPM..
> As background, yes i authenticate on LDAP, no encryption towards AD,
> and i interface AD directly on IP, so no delay looking up DNS. Also i
> only host the service via mod_dav_svn on http for the local network,
> so theres no https encryption in play in the webserver. I have no per
> directory restrictions, if a user has access to / then he has access
> to all repos underneath - now then i just host several vhosts with
> different having different restrictions.. so in many ways its a very
> simple solution.
>
>
> cheers
> Carmen
>
>
>
> On 2020-04-07 18:20, Nathan Hartman wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 3:44 AM Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
>>> Keep in mind most of the work performed during merges occurs
>>> client-side.
>>> If people are running old clients, ask them to upgrade.
>>>
>>> There are some server-configuration factors which can increase
>>> latency
>>> between client and servers, or which affect server-side performance
>>> in
>>> general, and those could be relevant:
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>> This is an important question, and an important thread.
>>
>> I'm not aware of a consolidated list of client/server performance tips
>> in our documentation, so I'd like to address that by saving the above
>> list and whatever else we learn here. (Perhaps as a FAQ.) I'll wait
>> for now, in case more suggestions come up. (e.g., delays due to DNS)
>>
>> Nathan
Received on 2020-04-14 10:25:56 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.