[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Trying to build svn 1.12.2 from tarball

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:25:44 +0200

On 04.09.2019 15:20, swdev wrote:
> I downloaded serf-1.3.9 and built it using
> scons APR=/home/jonny/subversion APU=/home/jonny/subversion
> ZLIB=/home/jonny/subversion OPENSSL=/home/jonny/subversion
> PREFIX=/home/jonny/subversion
> I then ran a scons check and got the following
> There were 14 failures:
> 1) test_ssl_trust_rootca: test/test_util.c:456: expected <0> but was
> <120199>
> 2) test_ssl_certificate_chain_with_anchor: test/test_util.c:456:
> expected <0> but was <120199>
> 3) test_ssl_certificate_chain_all_from_server: test/test_util.c:456:
> expected <0> but was <120199>
> 4) test_ssl_no_servercert_callback_allok: test/test_util.c:456:
> expected <0> but was <120170>
> 5) test_ssl_large_response: test/test_util.c:456: expected <0> but was
> <120170>
> 6) test_ssl_large_request: test/test_util.c:456: expected <0> but was
> <120170>
> 7) test_ssl_client_certificate: test/test_util.c:456: expected <0> but
> was <120170>
> 8) test_ssl_future_server_cert: test/test_util.c:456: expected <0> but
> was <120199>
> 9) test_setup_ssltunnel: test/test_util.c:456: expected <0> but was
> <120170>
> 10) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth: test/test_context.c:2138: expected <0>
> but was <120170>
> 11) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth_server_has_keepalive_off:
> test/test_context.c:2138: expected <0> but was <120170>
> 12) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth_proxy_has_keepalive_off:
> test/test_context.c:2138: expected <0> but was <120170>
> 13) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth_proxy_close_conn_on_200resp:
> test/test_context.c:2138: expected <0> but was <120170>
> 14) test_ssltunnel_digest_auth: test/test_util.c:456: expected <0> but
> was <120170>
>
> !!!FAILURES!!!
> Runs: 66 Passes: 52 Fails: 14
>
> So, some progress, but I am not sure if I should cary on sown this
> path, or should I use openssl-1.0.x and serf-1.3.8? or some other
> combination?

If you use Serf 1.3.x, then use the latest, 1.3.9, with the latest
OpenSSL 1.0.x.

It's perfectly safe to use the current code on the Serf 1.4.x branch
with OpenSSL 1.1.x. It hasn't been officially released but it's quite
stable and extensively tested on many platforms.

-- Brane
Received on 2019-09-04 15:25:46 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.