Re: wc.db: corruption after move?
From: Marc Strapetz <marc.strapetz_at_syntevo.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 21:13:35 +0100
On 26.11.2013 18:27, Branko Čibej wrote:
Sorry, actually in the underlying wc.db, it should be:
presence = normal and op_depth > 0 and moved_here > 0
>> Do you mean rows with nodes.moved_here=1 no corresponding rows with
Exactly, that seems to be the case.
>> Or something else?
I can't tell whether an operation fails, because an assertion when
> Marc is looking at some code that converts wc.db info to some internal
Unfortunately I haven't seen such a wc.db until now, but when tracing
-- Best regards, Marc Strapetz ============= syntevo GmbH http://www.syntevo.comReceived on 2013-11-26 21:14:09 CET |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.