On 26.11.2013 18:27, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 26.11.2013 18:08, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Marc Strapetz <marc.strapetz_at_syntevo.com> writes:
>>
>>> We are encountering working copies with
>>>
>>> nodes.presence = moved and nodes.moved_to = <null>
>> What does "nodes.presence = moved" mean? There has never been a moved
>> presence.
>>
>> Do you mean rows with nodes.moved_here=1 no corresponding rows with
>> non-null nodes.moved_to? Or something else?
>>
>>> As far as I have been told, this has already been fixed and backported
>>> to 1.8.5. Still, for those users which already have this corruption, is
>>> there a way to recover their working copies with standard Subversion
>>> functionality? Could a Revert work? And if it currently does not, could
>>> the Revert be more tolerant, so it could handle such cases?
>> What operation is failing? Are you getting some error?
>
> Marc is looking at some code that converts wc.db info to some internal
> structure ...
>
> Marc, can you please explain how the wc.db itself looks like? Hint: we
> don't support SmartSVN or SVNKit here. :)
FWIW, I've been promised a reproduction script using the command-line.
Hope it'll be ready soon.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion
WANdisco // Non-Stop Data
e. brane_at_wandisco.com
Received on 2013-11-26 19:11:44 CET