Re: MOD_DAV_SVN + SVNSERVE_WRAPPER + file system rights

Ben Reser wrote on Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 15:22:44 -0800:
> On 11/22/13 3:20 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > How about "dav_svn:/" then? That's consistent with mod_proxy's
> > precedent you cite and not similarly-confusing to the "svn://" URL
> > scheme.
>
> Yeah I probably should have used that but it's a little late for that since the
> release is already rolled and approved. I suppose we could change it again but
> unless there's people being confused by this I don't see the point of the
> churn. It's bad enough we had to change it from being NULL.

Done in r1544711 after IRC discussion.
Received on 2013-11-23 00:37:06 CET