Re: MOD_DAV_SVN + SVNSERVE_WRAPPER + file system rights

On 11/22/13 3:20 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> How about "dav_svn:/" then? That's consistent with mod_proxy's
> precedent you cite and not similarly-confusing to the "svn://" URL
> scheme.

Yeah I probably should have used that but it's a little late for that since the
release is already rolled and approved. I suppose we could change it again but
unless there's people being confused by this I don't see the point of the
churn. It's bad enough we had to change it from being NULL.
Received on 2013-11-23 00:23:20 CET