[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Breaking up a monolothic repository

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 09:43:53 -0500

On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Grierson, David
<David.Grierson_at_bskyb.com> wrote:
> I can see Trent's view point that people are weird and get freaked out by the unexpected (where they might expect the revision numbers to be relatively low).

I could see that for someone who had never used subversion before and
did not understand the concept of global revision numbers, but not for
anyone who has used a multi-project repository.

> I guess what we should be providing him are points like you do make to help him sell why this isn't an issue to the end users.
> Like Les says, if someone performs a large batch of commits to a particular branch then the trunk revision numbers are going to leap forward (unexpectedly). So what to sell those folks concerned about it is that they're experiencing this already.

Revision numbers aren't something you guess at or expect anything
from. They are only useful in terms of the repository history, and it
doesn't matter if your project runs sequentially or not. If you want
names/numbers that make human sense, you'll be copying to tags for
easier reference anyway.

    Les Mikesell
Received on 2013-09-09 16:44:29 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.