[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 11:22:10 +0200

On 19.05.2013 11:16, Zé wrote:
> On 05/19/2013 10:01 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> If Subversion
>> does not support your workflow, then replace Subversion, or change your
>> workflow.
> Did you even browsed the thread? This whole thread is on how
> subversion does not support branching, and how subversion would be
> even better than what it is if it actually supported it.

No. This whole thread is about you insisting that Subversion's model
does not contain a first-class objec that would fit your definition of a
branch. Your definition is only one of a myriad possibilities.

We know about the quirks and shortcomings -- and also strenghts -- of
Subversion's object model. Your going on about them does not change them
in any way. Your proposals always assume that it's OK to change the
model. It is not, for reasons that I've already stated elsewhere.

-- Brane

Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Received on 2013-05-19 11:22:50 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.