Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

From: Zé <jose.passes_at_gmx.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 10:16:17 +0100

On 05/19/2013 10:01 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> If Subversion
> does not support your workflow, then replace Subversion, or change your
> workflow.

Did you even browsed the thread? This whole thread is on how subversion
does not support branching, and how subversion would be even better than
what it is if it actually supported it.

And regarding suggestions on how to implement the workflow, feature
branches are one of two workflows which are explicitly covered by
subversion's documentation. Haven't you ever read the docs?

http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.branchmerge.commonpatterns.html#svn.branchmerge.commonpatterns.feature

-- 
Zé

Received on 2013-05-19 11:16:52 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Branko Čibej: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
Previous message: Zé: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
In reply to: Branko Čibej: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
Next in thread: Branko Čibej: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
Reply: Branko Čibej: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]