[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Blame/annotate not good enough...

From: Branko ─îibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:35:50 +0200

On 23.04.2013 16:29, Thorsten Sch├Âning wrote:
> Guten Tag Charles Gallo,
> am Dienstag, 23. April 2013 um 14:22 schrieben Sie:
>
>> Blame/annotate does exactly what I want, but the client (mumble
>> mumble) wants the info in the actual source code file as comments! I
>> explained that all the info is in blame/SVN, but they actually said
>> "the auditors won't see the repository, just the source, and they
>> want to be able to see what changed and by whom". That's why I'm not
>> allowed to delete code, only comment out. Sigh
> Maybe you should try a different approach: Why do the auditors don't
> have or want access to the repo? May read-only copy of the repo to
> access offline a solution?

You clearly have never had to deal with the more Neanderthal species of
auditor who believe meaningful technological advance stopped about 200
years before Gutenberg.

-- Brane

-- 
Branko ─îibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Received on 2013-04-24 14:36:30 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.