RE: Splitting out project from repo
From: Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:39:26 +0200
Hi,
The ‘svnrdump’ tool that was added in Subversion 1.7 might do exactly what you to do.
This tool allows creating a dumpfile from a url (E.g. file:///path/to/repos <file:///\\path\to\repos> ) and should skip unrelated paths for you during the repository processing.
You probably still want the svndumpfilter processing to drop empty revisions before loading it in a new repository.
Bert
From: Bryon Winger [mailto:bryonwinger_at_gmail.com]
I am going through a similar process myself and have some questions about
your concerns. I'm not trying to rock the boat, just looking fo clarity on a few
points.
For perspective, I am working with around 300 individual projects
in a 70+ Gb repository containing over 300k revisions.
If I understand correctly, you manually retrieve each version where
I personally don't see the advantage to waiting around for svnadmin dump
to process every unrelated revision. For one project, I am only concerned
with about 200 revisions, spread out over 210k unrelated revisions.
# This example took around 8 hours:
svnadmin dump /path/to/master | svndumpfilter --drop-empty-revs \
# However, when I run this on the same project:
for rev in `svn log -r0:HEAD file:///path/to/master/$PROJECT <file:///\\path\to\master\$PROJECT> | egrep \
"^r[0-9]+ |" | cut -d " " -f1`; do
svnadmin dump --incremental -r ${rev:1} /path/to/master | svndumpfilter \
include $PROJECT >> $PROJECT.dump
done
… I can have a usable dump file in under 30 seconds. I realize this will take
longer for larger projects, but I think it makes my point. ‘svnadmin dump’ is
still creating a full dump stream for each revision before svndumpfilter sees
that revision to decide to keep it or not.
Are you sure your approach doesn't need other paths
I absolutely agree with this checking for this. You can’t successfully pull out
a single path using svnadmin dump / svndumpfilter if there are copies from a
location outside of whatever you are filtering for.
I did notice that using svnrdump pointing to url/project seems to get
around the outside-copy-sources issue, but I think that’s another
discussion altogether.
> svnadmin dump $repo --quiet -r $rev --incremental >> $project.$rev.bak
Adding to revision files with >> should be impossible in your
Are you saying that appending to an existing dump file in general is a
problem or just with all of his node-path processing? I have had no
trouble appending to existing dump files.
Thanks,
Bryon Winger
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.