Marius Gedminas wrote on Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 08:28:22 +0200:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 08:32:35PM +0000, Philip Martin wrote:
> > Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> writes:
> >
> > > It is possible that authz rules prohibit access to the path affected
> > > by the revision. In which case svnsync would silently omit that path.
> >
> > $ svn log -vqr129027 svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > r129027 | (no author) | (no date)
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > That looks like a revision filtered by authz.
>
> I guess I'll have to patch svn-all-fast-export not to segfault when it
> encounters such empty revisions. (Unfortunately attempting to exclude
> them by revision number is not enough.)
>
+1. In general you cannot assume that any revprops will be present,
that any paths will have been changed, or that any path recorded as
changed has a different text or properties hash before v. after the
revision.
> Marius Gedminas
> --
> I never got into Linux. I swear to God, it's only lack of time. I'm past the
> years of my life where I can really dig into something like running a Linux
> system. I'm very sympathetic to the whole idea; Linux people always think the
> way I want to think.
> -- Steve Wozniak
Received on 2013-02-14 10:14:24 CET