In some projects we have to use Dimensions, which is a proprietary solution
(http://www.serena.com/products/dimensions-cm/index.html) ; However, the
standard solution for the projects is SVN and I don't think I will be able
to make everybody to learn and use use another program.
Well, in any case, I really appreciate your answer, this really sounds the
correct way of doing it. If I would start with a new team//company, "A good
DMS" would be my pick!
Thanks a lot!!
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Andy Levy <andy.levy_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:51 AM, armando.perico.neto_at_usi.ch <
> armando.perico.neto_at_usi.ch> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> you are probably right if we think only about code and software projects;
>> however, the needs for these features here are to control "documentation
>> projects" i.e.: to handle documents for ISOs and IECs standard
>> implementation (we pretty much handle .doc files - no need to handle line
>> diffs and merges for instance).
>>
>> Note: An important requirement here is that the path of the document
>> shall never change once it has been defined and published internally.
>>
>> Some uses cases:
>> - Only create a "release" versions of the documentation when all the
>> documents are with the "approved" status.
>> - Only specific author can make revisions
>> - A document cannot be "approved" if it has not been "reviewed" and so
>> on...
>>
>> I am not comfortable yetwith the solution we're planning to use in order
>> to solve this, however, it seems to be the solution with less "side-effect"
>> to the users (once SVN is already used as a repository system for the
>> documents).
>>
>> I am still trying to put the ideas together to come up with a good
>> solution. I am open to suggestions...
>>
>>
> I would suggest that you look at something other than SVN, to be perfectly
> honest. What you're really looking for is a document management system. In
> your original post you said "source code repository", but now you're
> talking about managing MS Office files - there's quite a bit of difference
> there!
>
> A good DMS will manage workflow, versioning, status tracking, etc.You can
> coerce SVN to do this & build a DMS on top of it, just as people have built
> things like this using MS Outlook's Shared Folders, or Lotus Notes as a
> base, but there are other tools that are more appropriate & better-tuned to
> document management requirements. If you're heavily invested in Microsoft
> already, start your search with SharePoint.
>
--
Armando Perico
Received on 2012-11-27 21:20:26 CET