Forgot to say about network - it's LAN 100 Mbit/s.
It is very strange first test
co https:// 40m 17 sec !!!
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:59 PM, slaventii <xumuku_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Want to share some of my tests results:
>> /trunk - 1.80 GB (1,941,844,940 bytes) - 148,114 Files; 52,519 Folders
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Old Hardware Server - Ubuntu 9.04:
>> svn, version 1.5.4 (r33841) compiled Aug 7 2009, 01:44:11
>> co svn:// ~ 23m 32sec
>> co https:// ~ 30m 10sec
>> svn vs https perf, % ~ > 28%
>>
>> up svn:// ~ 3m 22sec
>> up https:// ~ 5m 04sec
>> svn vs https perf, % > 50%
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> New Hardware Server - Ubuntu 12.04:
>> svn, version 1.6.17 (r1128011) compiled Dec 17 2011, 16:12:52
>> co svn:// ~ 18m 30sec
>> co https:// ~ 22m 47sec
>> svn vs https perf, % ~ > 23%
>>
>> up svn:// ~ 2m 06sec
>> up https:// ~ 2m 35sec
>> svn vs https perf, % ~ > 23%
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> New Hardware Server - Ubuntu 12.04:
>> svn, version 1.7.5 (r1336830) compiled Jul 19 2012, 21:53:29
>> co svn:// ~ 22m 50sec
>> co https:// ~ 24m 00sec
>> svn vs https perf, % ~ > 5%
>>
>> up svn:// ~ 2m 38sec
>> up https:// ~ 2m 28 sec
>> svn vs https perf, % ~ < 7%
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> I can see that in general performance didn't increase so much.
>> But difference between svn and http decreased.
>
> What kind of network connection between server and client?
>
> The svn version numbers you report, are those the versions of the
> server, or of the client, or both?
>
> --
> Johan
Received on 2012-07-31 21:54:31 CEST