On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:59 PM, slaventii <xumuku_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Want to share some of my tests results:
> /trunk - 1.80 GB (1,941,844,940 bytes) - 148,114 Files; 52,519 Folders
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Old Hardware Server - Ubuntu 9.04:
> svn, version 1.5.4 (r33841) compiled Aug 7 2009, 01:44:11
> co svn:// ~ 23m 32sec
> co https:// ~ 30m 10sec
> svn vs https perf, % ~ > 28%
>
> up svn:// ~ 3m 22sec
> up https:// ~ 5m 04sec
> svn vs https perf, % > 50%
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> New Hardware Server - Ubuntu 12.04:
> svn, version 1.6.17 (r1128011) compiled Dec 17 2011, 16:12:52
> co svn:// ~ 18m 30sec
> co https:// ~ 22m 47sec
> svn vs https perf, % ~ > 23%
>
> up svn:// ~ 2m 06sec
> up https:// ~ 2m 35sec
> svn vs https perf, % ~ > 23%
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> New Hardware Server - Ubuntu 12.04:
> svn, version 1.7.5 (r1336830) compiled Jul 19 2012, 21:53:29
> co svn:// ~ 22m 50sec
> co https:// ~ 24m 00sec
> svn vs https perf, % ~ > 5%
>
> up svn:// ~ 2m 38sec
> up https:// ~ 2m 28 sec
> svn vs https perf, % ~ < 7%
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> I can see that in general performance didn't increase so much.
> But difference between svn and http decreased.
What kind of network connection between server and client?
The svn version numbers you report, are those the versions of the
server, or of the client, or both?
--
Johan
Received on 2012-07-31 20:48:57 CEST