Re: Unreferenced pristines behavior in 1.7

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:57:28 +0000, Joshua McKinnon wrote:
...
> Oh the new working copy format is absolutely great. The point is only
> that the pristine files appear to build up over time, which seems new.

They do. For every changed file that comes to exist in the sandbox
a new pristine copy will be lying around; after committing twenty versions
of a file you have nineteen unreferenced pristines there.

...
> I am actually in the process of doing an all-branches checkout right
> now, to try and take advantage of the consolidation available in the
> new working copy format.

Unfortunately the consolidation only affects the pristines; you still
have separate copies of identicat files in the working copy.

Andreas

-- 
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800