Re: Apparent "svn rm" scaling problem in 1.7.x

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 06:29:59PM +0000, Philip Martin wrote:
> > I put in the ORDER BY to preserve the parents before children
> > notification used by 1.6. I wonder if that notification order is
> > important?
>
> See r1196191.
> It should preserve the 1.6.x order (via svn_path_compare_paths()).
>

Just a side note. I have not been able to find a "final" version of the
svnbench tool with results for 1.7.0 compared with 1.6.17. The results I
can find are only comparing 1.7.x with trunk. Just wondering if those
tests show a problem with rm so that we can track progress via those tests.

Adding Neels in case he archived any results.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/