RE: Apparent "svn rm" scaling problem in 1.7.x
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:39:02 -0600
I'd have to do some research to get the options. It's a proprietary filesystem.
That being said, I understand that nfs mounted working copies will degrade my performance. I really think this is a more fundamental performance issue with svn rm that gets exacerbated with slow performance over nfs.
From: Tony Sweeney [mailto:tsweeney_at_omnifone.com
What are your NFS mount options?
From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markphip_at_gmail.com]<mailto:[mailto:markphip_at_gmail.com]>
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:10 PM, <michael_rytting_at_agilent.com<mailto:michael_rytting_at_agilent.com>> wrote:
Here is some similar data for a local working copy. These are all run with the env variable set. Again, svn rm is significantly slower than all other operations.
svn rm <file> 0.35s
But look how much it improved compared to how much the others improved?
svn rm <file> 7s
Many of these commands are not even impacted by that variable. That said, I do not get how this envvar can shave 7 seconds off the operation when it usually only sleeps for a second.
-- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> Version: 2012.0.1834 / Virus Database: 2092/4589 - Release Date: 11/01/11 ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________Received on 2011-11-01 18:39:39 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.