Re: Apparent "svn rm" scaling problem in 1.7.x

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:12:04AM -0600, michael_rytting_at_agilent.com
wrote:
> I did an additional benchmark doing "svn rm dir/*" on a local
> directory instead of an nfs directory. It runs in 10.4s. Is going
> from 10.4s to 6m15s acceptable when using a working copy on nfs vs
> local? I am fine with a certain amount of slowdown when using nfs.
> But, I don't see this kind of degradation on nfs vs local for other
> operations. Svn rm seems particularly susceptible.
>

I've taken a stab at fixing this, see
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1195873

Would you be able to test a patch against 1.7.x?
There are some conflicts when the above commit is merged into the 1.7.x
branch, so I'll have to prepare a special patch for 1.7.x.
Received on 2011-11-01 09:50:09 CET