On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:18 AM, David Aldrich
>> <David.Aldrich_at_emea.nec.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> > I think there was mention on the developers list of releasing
>>>> > Subversion 1.6.17. I am interested in the improvements to Windows
>>>> > checkout.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Are you talking about version 1.6.17 or version 1.7.x? I haven't seen anything
>>>> about 1.6.17 here on the list, but there have been a few references on 1.7.x
>>>> here...
>>>>
>>>> The news in the upcoming 1.7.x you'll find here:
>>>> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html
>>>> ... but no release date though
>>>
>>> I really did mean 1.6.17, as it is on the status page.
>>
>> Note that the change you are looking for has been nominated for
>> backport but does not have the essential 3 votes yet. So if you have
>> built the branch and seen improvements it would not hurt to start
>> lobbying. You might motivate someone to review the branch and vote
>> for it.
>>
>> See: /branches/1.6.x-issue3719
>
> It currently has 2 of the 3 required votes (see
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS). I
> have previously looked at the branch (and built it), but didn't have
> time to review it in detail yet. I'll try to take another look tonight
> so this can be backported ...
Ok, the 3rd vote is in, so the fix is all set for being backported.
When 1.6.17 gets made, it should hop along ...
--
Johan
Received on 2011-04-27 02:09:11 CEST