[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: question about --revision DATE

From: Andy Levy <andy.levy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:15:53 -0500

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 13:55, Geoffrey Myers
<lists_at_serioustechnology.com> wrote:
> Andy Levy wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 13:21, Geoffrey Myers
>> <lists_at_serioustechnology.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm hoping someone can explain the following output to me:
>>>
>>>  svn log --revision {2010-12-02}:{2010-12-02}
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> r5139 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 21:27:31 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 2 lines
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> svn log --revision {2010-12-01}:{2010-12-02}
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> r5137 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 20:22:17 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 2 lines
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> r5138 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 20:48:54 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 5 lines
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> r5139 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 21:27:31 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 2 lines
>>
>>
>> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.tour.revs.specifiers.html#svn.tour.revs.dates
>>
>> Especially the "Is Subversion a day early?" box.
>
>
> Okay, but why does the first return a single record, and the second return
> 3?  I would expect the first to return either nothing or 3.

Because it's the most recent revision as of the date you gave.
Received on 2010-12-02 20:17:11 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.