[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: question about --revision DATE

From: Geoffrey Myers <lists_at_serioustechnology.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 13:55:30 -0500

Andy Levy wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 13:21, Geoffrey Myers
> <lists_at_serioustechnology.com> wrote:
>> I'm hoping someone can explain the following output to me:
>>
>> svn log --revision {2010-12-02}:{2010-12-02}
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r5139 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 21:27:31 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 2 lines
>>
>>
>>
>> svn log --revision {2010-12-01}:{2010-12-02}
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r5137 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 20:22:17 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 2 lines
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r5138 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 20:48:54 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 5 lines
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r5139 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 21:27:31 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 2 lines
>
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.tour.revs.specifiers.html#svn.tour.revs.dates
>
> Especially the "Is Subversion a day early?" box.

Okay, but why does the first return a single record, and the second
return 3? I would expect the first to return either nothing or 3.

-- 
Until later, Geoffrey
"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson
Received on 2010-12-02 19:56:09 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.