[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Bug report against SVN 1.6.13

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:30:41 +0200

Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 14:43:57 +0200:
> Your patch seems to handle copies only. What about locally added files?

Does this part of the regression patch cover the scenario you have in mind?

    Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/lock_tests.py
    ===================================================================
    --- subversion/tests/cmdline/lock_tests.py (revision 1023400)
    +++ subversion/tests/cmdline/lock_tests.py (working copy)
    @@ -1573,6 +1590,39 @@ def replace_and_propset_locked_path(sbox):
    +def cp_isnt_ro(sbox):
    ...
    + # added file
    + sbox.simple_add(kappa_path)
    + svntest.actions.set_prop('svn:needs-lock', 'yes', kappa_path)
    + is_writable(kappa_path)
    + sbox.simple_commit(kappa_path)
    + is_readonly(kappa_path)
    ...
    @@ -1619,6 +1669,7 @@ test_list = [ None,
    + cp_isnt_ro,
           ]
Received on 2010-10-17 16:32:55 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.