[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: subversion failover

From: Brian Brophy <brianmbrophy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:50:59 -0400

We also use Veritas Clustering. Yes, it is overkill, but in a corporate
world this sometimes happens. SVN clients are purely on the HTTPS
interface so Apache is our service-facing client view. There are (2)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux servers using a SAN to persist the repository
data. Veritas takes care of ensuring the SAN and cluster IP are mounted
on the active node and that Apache is running.

kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com wrote:
> west alto <westalto_at_gmail.com> wrote on 03/22/2010 11:21:12 AM:
> > Any one tried High Availability with subversion, using Apache,
> > Heartbeat and NFS? Is this possible? any problems encountered?
> >
> > My requirement doesn't need to be load balance, I just want that when
> > my primary subversion server is down my secondary server would be up.
> > Does not need to be realtime, but needs to be auto failover.
> We have successfully used Veritas for failover. Quite overkill for
> most purposes though.
> Kevin R.
Received on 2010-03-22 21:51:31 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.