RE: SVN bug? merge replaces all files in an added directory
From: Rob Hubbard <rob.hubbard_at_softel.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:34:17 +0100
Hello Peter,
Thanks very much for the reply and the ideas.
Please continue to CC me on any further replies.
> Hi Rob,
I can see how the above could give rise to such similar problems. That's
R branch2/test (from /trunk/test:1234)
whereas in my situation, I am expecting to see
A branch/test (from /trunk/test:1234)
There is no second branch involved in my case.
> Maybe you can try to set this up as a test to see if this reproduces
As you suggested, I took a closer look at what's happening at the
As far as I can tell, here are the key steps:
(1) a branch is created from the trunk
However, I have tried this in a test script, and I still get correct
Unfortunately, there is a lot of activity on the repository, and the
I have also tried merging with and without the --ignore-ancestry option
Again, it could be a problem with different versions of
If anyone has any further suggestions or ideas, I'd still be interested
> (TSVN repo-browser helps a lot!).
Yes I use a mixture of SVN and T-SVN, but I usually have to hunt around
> PS:
I'm not, but this is not the first time I've been asked the question.
Thanks again for your help (to both Peter and Lakshman).
Kind regards,
________________________________________________________________
Powering Television Beyond the Video (TM)
------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.