Re: Comparison Collabnet and VisualSVN
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Ari S <sadarjoen_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>> I would assume that VisualSVN is largely the same (does not customize
>> its binaries). I know they toss in some Windows-specific tools and
>> configuration UI. My guess is that VisualSVN is configuring Apache
>> for Windows authentication or something like that. So to do a real
>> comparison, you would need to configure the Apache server provided in
>> the CollabNet distribution to do something similar. Or conversely, if
>> the VisualSVN server allows you to use plain Apache authentication
>> then you could try it that way.
> Thanks for your reply!
> I did set up VisualSVN _and_ CollabNet such that they both use Apache
> Without that the difference was even 100% (VisualSVN twice as slow as
VisualSVN Server is just properly compiled and packaged original
Subversion. So you shouldn't have difference in performance between
VisualSVN Server and CollabNet.
Could you please provide a little bit more information about your
configuration: server os, client os, IPv4 or IPv4, etc. What operation
you are used to measure peformance?
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-29 18:42:45 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users