Re: Comparison Collabnet and VisualSVN

Hi Mark,

> I would assume that VisualSVN is largely the same (does not customize
> its binaries).  I know they toss in some Windows-specific tools and
> configuration UI.  My guess is that VisualSVN is configuring Apache
> for Windows authentication or something like that.  So to do a real
> comparison, you would need to configure the Apache server provided in
> the CollabNet distribution to do something similar.  Or conversely, if
> the VisualSVN server allows you to use plain Apache authentication
> then you could try it that way.

Thanks for your reply!
I did set up VisualSVN _and_ CollabNet such that they both use Apache
authentication.
Without that the difference was even 100% (VisualSVN twice as slow as
Collabnet).

Thanks for the additional information on what goes into your packages.

Best Regards,
Ari

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2401668

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-29 17:23:58 CEST