[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Comparison Collabnet and VisualSVN

From: Ari S <sadarjoen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:22:47 -0700 (PDT)

Hi Mark,

> I would assume that VisualSVN is largely the same (does not customize
> its binaries).  I know they toss in some Windows-specific tools and
> configuration UI.  My guess is that VisualSVN is configuring Apache
> for Windows authentication or something like that.  So to do a real
> comparison, you would need to configure the Apache server provided in
> the CollabNet distribution to do something similar.  Or conversely, if
> the VisualSVN server allows you to use plain Apache authentication
> then you could try it that way.

Thanks for your reply!
I did set up VisualSVN _and_ CollabNet such that they both use Apache
Without that the difference was even 100% (VisualSVN twice as slow as

Thanks for the additional information on what goes into your packages.

Best Regards,


To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-29 17:23:58 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.