Re: Fwd: Re[4]: public/private commits
From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:43:22 -0500
Andrey Dibrov wrote:
>>>> This is really ambiguous to create branch per developer.
No it doesn't, other than than making sure the developers have write access in
> A private/public commits shouldn't require them (may be
Branches are the usual/expected solution to this problem. Subversion doesn't
>> The danger is that the longer you keep people isolated, the harder it
Yes, that's the point of branches - they isolate changes from other copies until
>>>> Developers working together on a project should almost never have a
An occasional broken build during development should not be considered a
-- Les Mikesell lesmikesell_at_gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------ http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2401001 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].Received on 2009-09-28 02:44:22 CEST |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.