[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

annoying "Attempt to add tree conflict that already exists" [ was "back-end fsfs DB corruption? - attempt to merge uncovering it" ]

From: Paul Hammant <paul_at_hammant.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:42:45 -0500

[ subj line changed as requested ]

On Sep 15, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 03:56:34PM -0500, Paul Hammant wrote:
>> We rebuild with --prefix pointing to the root of the libsvn_*
>> directories.
> Which directory do you mean?
> The installation prefix should point to a new, empty directory,
> or to an existing directory which already contains bin/ and lib/
> and such. For example:
> ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/subversion-1.6.5
> or
> ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/

./configure --prefix=/path/to/build/dir/subversion

I grant you that's not an empty directly, thus will try everything
once more.

> Don't use --prefix=/usr or you will overwrite files installed
> by the distribution's package management system.
>> It is the same though, it halts at the same file.
> What does the command
> which svn
> say, and what does
> ldd `which svn`
> say?

> ldd subversion/svn/svn
   not a dynamic executable
> which svn

We're not using the /usr/bin/svn one for the tests we're doing. We're
hard coding the path to the recently built one.

- Paul


To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-16 00:43:35 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.