Re: back-end fsfs DB corruption? - attempt to merge uncovering it

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:03:30AM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Wouldn't svn_ver_check_list() complain if a 1.6.x_at_HEAD binary (which
> calls itself 1.6.6-dev) found a 1.6.5 (release) library at runtime?

Possibly. But it would mean that our fix isn't working :(
Well, I'm convinced that the fix should work. I've tested it
many times. But maybe we didn't catch some corner case.

In which case I'd be very grateful for a reproduction script
which starts with an empty repository and issues the appropriate
svn commands to eventually trigger the double-tree conflict error.

Stefan

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2395275

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-16 00:28:50 CEST