At 01:42 PM 6/8/2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
>"trunk" is a convention - where you normally have a directory that is
>named trunk to separate it from branches and tags that you may create
>later. It is good practice (and described in the manual) to create the
>trunk/branches/tags directories for each project before adding anything
>else. But, that doesn't seem to be related to your immediate problem.
Right... and we are following the trunk / branch / tag convention for
source code and project-related documents like SRS / SDD / etc.
(we're following an iterative development model so there will be
several "releases" of the SRS / SDD / code / etc.).
Where I'm working now is company-wide policy and procedures documents
that won't change due to the iterative model (they may change, but
not due to the iterative model). So, I decided I didn't need the
trunk / branch / tag convention for that.
As you say, not related to the current problem anyway...
>Normally the "?" means that you have a local copy that you created but
>didn't use the 'svn add' command to tell subversion about it. If
>someone else added them and committed to the repo, you shouldn't have
>created a local copy - the update should have brought them in.
Yup, that's right... hence, trying to figure out what the #^$@ happened.
I sent an email to the IT group that administers the Subversion
server, trying to find out what version of Subversion they're
running, but haven't heard back yet.
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-06-08 20:19:40 CEST