At 01:42 PM 6/8/2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>>>>
>"trunk" is a convention - where you normally have a directory that is
>named trunk to separate it from branches and tags that you may create
>later. It is good practice (and described in the manual) to create the
>trunk/branches/tags directories for each project before adding anything
>else. But, that doesn't seem to be related to your immediate problem.
<<<<<
Right... and we are following the trunk / branch / tag convention for
source code and project-related documents like SRS / SDD / etc.
(we're following an iterative development model so there will be
several "releases" of the SRS / SDD / code / etc.).
Where I'm working now is company-wide policy and procedures documents
that won't change due to the iterative model (they may change, but
not due to the iterative model). So, I decided I didn't need the
trunk / branch / tag convention for that.
As you say, not related to the current problem anyway...
>>>>>
>Normally the "?" means that you have a local copy that you created but
>didn't use the 'svn add' command to tell subversion about it. If
>someone else added them and committed to the repo, you shouldn't have
>created a local copy - the update should have brought them in.
<<<<<
Yup, that's right... hence, trying to figure out what the #^$@ happened.
I sent an email to the IT group that administers the Subversion
server, trying to find out what version of Subversion they're
running, but haven't heard back yet.
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2360403
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-06-08 20:19:40 CEST