[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam

From: <webpost_at_tigris.org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:09:19 -0700 (PDT)

Thanks for the posts. That is the Borland StarTeam point for us as well, difficult or impossible to upgrade. Once we got a test copy upgraded it didn't take long to find bugs that Borland has no plans to fix.

> I'm using Subversion in one building and StarTeam in another. Subversion is fine. StarTeam seems to be OK as long you have a stable development team and never need to upgrade it. The current attempt to upgrade StarTeam has been a nightmare for the sysadmins and SCM person involved. Based on this alone, I would never recommend StarTeam.
>
> I am getting up to speed on Subversion to hopefully replace StarTeam. So far, I find it intuitive and easy to use.

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2302204

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-05-18 21:34:11 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.