Re: svn log slowness

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Johan Corveleyn
<johan.corveleyn_at_uz.kuleuven.ac.be> wrote:
>> > Is there any specific reason why the CollabNet binary for Solaris
>> > doesn't include BDB support? Is it just because FSFS is the default,
>> > and the easiest for maintenance?
>>
>> I don't think you want to use a BDB repository mounted over NFS.
>> FSFS has been designed for that, but BDB is supposed to have problems
>> with it.
>
> Ok, thanks for reminding me. But apart from that, is there a specific reason why BDB support is not built into the subversion binaries for Solaris (don't know about binaries for other platforms)?

None of the CollabNet-certified binaries include BDB support. It is
not just Solaris. This is primarily for support reasons.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2190010
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].