RE: svn log slowness

> > Is there any specific reason why the CollabNet binary for Solaris
> > doesn't include BDB support? Is it just because FSFS is the default,
> > and the easiest for maintenance?
>
> I don't think you want to use a BDB repository mounted over NFS.
> FSFS has been designed for that, but BDB is supposed to have problems
> with it.

Ok, thanks for reminding me. But apart from that, is there a specific reason why BDB support is not built into the subversion binaries for Solaris (don't know about binaries for other platforms)?

Johan

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2153596

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-05-10 00:43:19 CEST