Re: Subversion version confusion.

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:12, Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andy Levy [mailto:andy.levy_at_gmail.com]
>> Sent: vrijdag 3 april 2009 15:35
>> To: James Green; users_at_subversion.tigris.org
>> Subject: Re: Subversion version confusion.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 09:15, James Green <James.Green_at_occam-dm.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks for this Andy.
>> >
>> > I've basically disabled Ankh in VS for the time being.  TortoiseSvn is the
>> preferred option anyhow.
>> >
>> > Seems that I need to apply more version control rather than just blindly
>> updating when a new version become available.
>>
>> Absolutely. I'm holding off on deploying TSVN 1.6 due to some bugs
>> there; I also have need for 4 clients (command-line, TSVN, AnkhSVN &
>> Subclipse) on my own workstation, and I need to make sure the
>> distributions are all up to 1.6 before I can even think about it.
>>
>> There's nothing wrong with staying a couple weeks behind behind if the
>> "old version" is working well.
>
> You could try the AnkhSVN 2.1 daily builds from http://ankhsvn.net/daily. They are built on top of Subversion 1.6.0.
> (We are working on the final issues before releasing the first AnkhSVN 2.1 release. Most importantly enhancing the reporting of tree conflicts.)

But I'm also waiting on TSVN 1.6.1 and haven't checked on the status
of Subclipse.

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1532667

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-04-03 16:18:24 CEST