[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Subversion version confusion.

From: Bert Huijben <rhuijben_at_sharpsvn.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:12:20 +0200

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Levy [mailto:andy.levy_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 3 april 2009 15:35
> To: James Green; users_at_subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion version confusion.
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 09:15, James Green <James.Green_at_occam-dm.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for this Andy.
> >
> > I've basically disabled Ankh in VS for the time being. TortoiseSvn is the
> preferred option anyhow.
> >
> > Seems that I need to apply more version control rather than just blindly
> updating when a new version become available.
> Absolutely. I'm holding off on deploying TSVN 1.6 due to some bugs
> there; I also have need for 4 clients (command-line, TSVN, AnkhSVN &
> Subclipse) on my own workstation, and I need to make sure the
> distributions are all up to 1.6 before I can even think about it.
> There's nothing wrong with staying a couple weeks behind behind if the
> "old version" is working well.

You could try the AnkhSVN 2.1 daily builds from http://ankhsvn.net/daily. They are built on top of Subversion 1.6.0.
(We are working on the final issues before releasing the first AnkhSVN 2.1 release. Most importantly enhancing the reporting of tree conflicts.)

When we get Subversion 1.5 support in our repository it will become a lot easier to maintain two AnkhSVN versions side by side. (After waiting for half a year, it should be upgraded this weekend).



To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-04-03 16:13:21 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.