On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 09:47:37AM -0500, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 2, 2009, at 7:22 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> People compiling their own builds run into this problem quite
>>> frequently
>>> because of bugs in libtool. We cannot fix it, but some of us (e.g. me)
>>> are getting increasingly annoyed by it.
>>
>> Heh. I had a user ask me just the other day about "why aren't the
>> subversion libraries versioned so we can have multiple versions (i.e.,
>> 1.5.6 and 1.6.0) installed side-by-side?" I really didn't have a good
>> answer, but a brain damaged libtool sounds like it's something in the
>> right direction.
>
> The libtool documentation explains how to do this.
> But we don't do it. I don't know the reason why we don't do it.
> I asked someone about it before but I don't remember the answer I got.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/Updating-version-info.html#Updating-version-info
I'm just about to report success on x86_64. By explicitly using the
--with-apr= and --with-apr-util args (and without neon or serf) I got
good tests. Now I'm trying to add neon back in so I have a good
server and client (if I read INSTALL correctly).
I believe there is a bug in subversion's configure for x86_64. The
/usr/bin/apr-1-config and /usr/bin/apu-1-config scripts were there
but, fo some reason, were not found. Likewise, when the tests were
failing, the libraries being used (checking ldd) appeared to be the
ones built in the subversion sub-directories, but they couldn't find
the apr_hash_clear which was there.
Still hunting...
-Tom
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1522361
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-04-02 20:24:57 CEST