AW: externals definition: surprising behaviour
From: Schroeder, Hartmut <Hartmut.Schroeder_at_plath.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:14:42 +0100
Hi,
But a fix could be:
When a wc with externals def. is checked out, the information that it belongs to an externals def. can be stored in the controlfiles under '.svn'. When one is in the wc of some stuff that belongs to an externals def and will do an update or an commit on an externals def. with a fixed rev. it can be blocked.
Regards
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
On Feb 19, 2009, at 03:12, Schroeder, Hartmut wrote:
> I detected a surprising behaviour of externals definition (svn 1.5.5):
If there have been no other changes in the place the external points
> , even an update will not
An update in the externals working copy will update the external to
An update in the directory containing the externals definition will
> But: If I use an explicit revision in my externals I don't want access
I believe this behaves as designed. It could probably be improved,
------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.