Re: externals definition: surprising behaviour
From: Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2009a_at_ryandesign.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:33:41 -0600
On Feb 19, 2009, at 03:12, Schroeder, Hartmut wrote:
> I detected a surprising behaviour of externals definition (svn 1.5.5):
If there have been no other changes in the place the external points
> , even an update will not
An update in the externals working copy will update the external to
An update in the directory containing the externals definition will
> But: If I use an explicit revision in my externals I don't want access
I believe this behaves as designed. It could probably be improved,
------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.