Re: Multiple repositories per project

My immediate thought is that it is possibly their way of handling security issues? Maybe they do not want the technical writers (doc repository) anywhere near the source code (src repository) and feel this is the way to handle it or is the only way they can do it.

RC

--- On Tue, 2/3/09, vlad.tepes_at_gmx.net <vlad.tepes_at_gmx.net> wrote:
From: vlad.tepes_at_gmx.net <vlad.tepes_at_gmx.net>
Subject: Multiple repositories per project
To: users_at_subversion.tigris.org
Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 2:14 PM

hello list,

in the company i work we have the questionable policy of creating three
repositories for each project by default. in addition to a repository named
'src' we will also have one named 'doc' and another named
'data' (the latter being empty for almost all projects).

i have the feeling that this might be a case of over-engineering (and to be
honest i think it's dumb). but i have no technical arguments against this
policy either.

so, is it dumb, is it ok, or is it not worth arguing?

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1096867

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
[users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1097985

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-02-03 19:44:05 CET