[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Multiple repositories per project

From: Bob Archer <bob.archer_at_amsi.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:26:46 -0500

Rather than say that this is dumb my question would be WHY are they
doing it this way? It may be that there is a thought that it is
necessary to meet some requirement and they are mistaken. The only
reason I can think of where you MUST have separate repositories is to
put them on separate servers or volumes.

Other than that...

BOb

> -----Original Message-----
> From: vlad.tepes_at_gmx.net [mailto:vlad.tepes_at_gmx.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 9:14 AM
> To: users_at_subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Multiple repositories per project
>
> hello list,
>
> in the company i work we have the questionable policy of creating
three
> repositories for each project by default. in addition to a repository
> named 'src' we will also have one named 'doc' and another named 'data'
> (the latter being empty for almost all projects).
>
> i have the feeling that this might be a case of over-engineering (and
to
> be honest i think it's dumb). but i have no technical arguments
against
> this policy either.
>
> so, is it dumb, is it ok, or is it not worth arguing?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageI
d=
> 1096867
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-
> unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1097908

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-02-03 19:27:43 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.