[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Compatibility of Subversion 1.3 with Subversion 1.5 Repository

From: David Weintraub <qazwart_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 11:35:20 -0500

Thanks for the quick response.

I tried some testing just now on a backup of our repository, and
everything seemed fine. I just want to make absolutely sure that I
wouldn't be breaking our build system with an upgrade.

I wish I could upgrade our build system to use Subversion 1.5, but too
many things are running on that box to take it down and take it apart.

I'll setup a Hudson build with a backup repository and make sure that
Hudson doesn't complain about anything. I had to "upgrade" Hudson, so
it would work with a Subversion 1.3 client. I want to make sure Hudson
doesn't throw a fit if I do an upgrade.

Otherwise, the "svnadmin upgrade" command worked well.

--
David Weintraub
qazwart_at_gmail.com
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> There should not be anything to be concerned about.  It will work fine
> with a 1.3 client.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:17 AM, David Weintraub <qazwart_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> I thought I had everything setup nice and clean. I have Subversion 1.5
>> installed as my server, and finally got the last project converted
>> over to Subversion.
>> However, our build machine is using Subversion 1.3. It's an old SUSE
>> Linux installation, and we simply couldn't get a more recent revision
>> of Subversion to work on it. Not without updating Apache, APR, Neon,
>> and who knows what else. Heck, it took us a week just to get
>> Subversion 1.3 running, so upgrading isn't an option right now.
>> Now, here's the problem: Everything seemed to work our nicely. Our
>> build machine (running 1.3) is able via Hudson to checkout the code
>> and do a build. It can do labeling via Hudson. It looks good.
>> However, one of our developers noticed that our Server (running
>> Subversion 1.5) has only DB format 2 on it. He tried a "svn log -g"
>> and got the following error message:
>>
>> svn: Querying mergeinfo requires version 3 of the FSFS filesystem
>> schema; filesystem '/solbright/svn_repositories/dev/db' uses only
>> version 2.
>>
>> I can run svnadmin upgrade on the Subversion repository, and in
>> seconds, get it to be upgraded to db format version 3. I've tried this
>> on a back of our server with no problems.
>>
>> The question I have are possible side effects on our build server
>> running Subversion 1.3. I know that this build server can't do merge
>> tracking, but I don't really need to worry about that. I simply want
>> to know if there would be any side effect upgrading our repository to
>> DB format version 3. All this subversion client has to do is checkout
>> the code, work with Hudson, and do labeling. There's no real
>> development that takes place on it.
>>
>> From what limited testing I'm doing, it all looks okay. I just want
>> some confirmation that I won't be blowing everything up if I do the
>> upgrade.
>>
>> --
>> David Weintraub
>> qazwart_at_gmail.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
>
> Mark Phippard
> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-30 17:35:53 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.