Re: Returning Warnings from Subversion Hooks
From: David Weintraub <qazwart_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:09:25 -0500
If you have something that you want to tell the client, but don't want to
As for debugging a pre-commit hook, consider writing the output of a hook to
It can be a pain, but it's better than the way Perforce does it. In
-- David Weintraub qazwart_at_gmail.com On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Hutchinson, Greg < Greg.Hutchinson_at_fcc-fac.ca> wrote: > Sometimes it would be useful to return a warning in a post-commit-hook. > (The class you checked in contains raw types, you should consider fixing.) > > However, it is our understanding that if we write anything to Stderr it > will not make it back to the client unless the hook returns non-zero. Is > this correct? and does anyone else see this as a useful feature? > > Thanks, > > > > *Greg Hutchinson, B.Sc.* > *Principal Application Developer /**Développeur principal* > *Farm Credit Canada / Financement agricole Canada* > 1800 Hamilton Street, P.O. Box 4320 > 1800, rue Hamilton, C.P. 4320 > Regina SK S4P 4L3 > Tel/Tél. : (306) 780-3990 Cell : (306) 539-9060 Fax/Télec. : (306) 780-5655 > E-mail/Courriel : greg.hutchinson_at_fcc-fac.ca ** > > *Advancing the business of agriculture. Pour l'avenir de l'agroindustrie.* > * * > > *Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Pensons à > l'environnement avant **d'imprimer ce courriel.* > > >Received on 2008-11-30 02:09:52 CET |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.