Well, the current best practice seems to be to use a pre-commit hook
that disallows all operations on exiting directories except for 'add'
and maybe 'delete' on the root of the tags directory. I'm fairly
certain that if you have a look around, you'll find a variety of
scripts doing that.
cheers
felix
On Nov 25, 2008, at 3:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> i'm sure this topic comes up on a regular basis and i've already
> poked around but couldn't find a definitive answer -- what's the
> current best practice with respect to tagging and knowing that what
> you've tagged is immutable?
>
> obviously(?), a simple copy-based tag can always be checked out
> again and modified. as i see it based on what others have written,
> the only true way to represent an immutable tag is via the revision
> number, but i don't see a way to somehow tie or alias that to a tag.
> or am i just missing it? thanks.
>
> it's not critical, i'm just curious what the state of immutable
> tagging is these days.
>
> rday
> --
>
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
> Robert P. J. Day
> Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
> Have classroom, will lecture.
>
> http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario,
> CANADA
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
>
>
--
Felix Gilcher
Bitextender GmbH
Paul-Heyse-Str. 6
D-80336 München
T: +49 89 57 08 15 16
F: +49 89 57 08 15 17
M: +49 172 840 88 28
felix.gilcher_at_bitextender.com
http://bitextender.com/
Amtsgericht München, HRB 174280
Geschäftsführer: David Zülke, Florian Clever
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on 2008-11-25 15:36:57 CET