[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Using Tag methodology

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:48:35 -0600

David Weintraub wrote:
> >
> The problem with the floating tag is what happens if you have to move
> back in time.

That's a problem solved by floating tags, not caused by them. Just
float your "current-2" tag to the "current-1" postition, "current-1" to
"current, and set a new "current" at the tested workspace version.

> What was your previous QA release?

If you can float that tag, you always know that without tracking any
changing names or numbers.

> What if you discover
> a new bug in your QA release and you want to know what changed between
> one QA release and another. You can't with a floating tag because you
> lost your history.

You don't lose anything because the history exists apart from the tags.
  The tags just identify interesting sets of revisions so you can script
all the obvious things you are likely to want to do with them without
having to pick up variable revision identifiers at runtime.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell_at_gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-18 06:49:27 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.