[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: More Merge Bad Behavior

From: Gleason, Todd <tgleason_at_impac.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:48:31 -0800

Can anyone confirm whether this is the sort of thing that 1.5.3-1.5.4
fixed?

http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/tags/1.5.4/CHANGES

--Todd

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rush Manbert [mailto:rush_at_manbert.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 3:45 PM
> To: subversion
> Subject: More Merge Bad Behavior
>
> I posted a few days ago about my problems merging either to a branch
> from the trunk or from that branch back to the trunk.
>
> Now a colleague is seeing the same problem.
>
> He copied the trunk to a branch 3 days ago. We have been making
> changes on the branch since then, and now we're finished. In the
> meantime, some non-overlapping changes happened in the trunk. Now he
> wants to merge the branch back into the trunk. Since he never needed
> to synch changes in the trunk by merging, we don't need to do a
> reintegration merge, so he tried this:
> * Check out the trunk to ~/trunk_merge
> * cd ~/trunk_merge
> * svn merge URL_TO_BRANCH
>
> Svn thinks about this for a while, then says it wants to merge
> revision 2 through 1633 to the WC. The branch was created at revision
> 1634.
>
> This wants to do all sorts of crazy stuff, so we killed it, ran svn
> revert -R ., then svn stat to be sure we had a pristine WC.
>
> Then we tried this merge command:
> svn merge URL_TO_BRANCH -r1634:head --dry-run
>
> The output from this looks like it would do the right thing.
>
> This is the second time now that the merge wants to merge everything
> from the beginning of the world (rev 2) through the revision just
> before the branch was created (rev 1633), and we don't understand why
> this is happening. We thought Subversion 1.5 was supposed to track the
> revisions correctly so that this would work without needing us to
> specify the revisions.
>
> We are running the 1.5.1 client, and the server is running 1.5.0. We
> created both branches using SmartSVN 4, which is a SVN 1.5-compliant
> client.
>
> We have also done a very similar merge in the past (2 months ago), and
> it worked as expected.
>
> We're sort of at a loss here. My colleague suspects there is something
> wrong with our repository. I said I would post again and see if any of
> the experts had some advice. Something we can look at on the
> repository, or the branch, or ??? Any guidance would be appreciated.
>
> - Rush
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-14 23:49:13 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.